EmphaticWiki blemisher

From Lumeniki
(Redirected from RationalWiki blemisher)
Jump to: navigation, search

Do they call you troll?[edit]

Please create a username. I think you will have a difficult time being blocked here (by Lumenos) so long as you are not doing something actually illegal, or repeatedly deleting large amounts of ramblings (which I am still fond of). (Rather add your own ramblings, so we may discuss, analyze, and possibly synergize differences.)

This page is for YOU! Please write a history (however long) of what they done to you.


(MarcusCicero is known also as MC.)

I attempted to bring reason to a haven of authoritarianism, I tried to correct their rhetoric with reality, I succeeded in revealing their spectacle of fascist thought for everyone to see. And for that they persecute me. MarcusCicero 18:13, June 20, 2010 (UTC)


Ahh. This be you then too? Lumenos 18:22, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Or on this "racist" site (the wandalism itself)? (Don't answer if you like.) Lumenos 18:35, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, that is me. Though I never had an account on metapedia. That is an imposter. I should hope you know that the background to my tale contains several expletives, and a noble struggle to make rationalism inherent in all my deeds on Rationalwiki. MarcusCicero 20:02, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
Ahh we have found an impostor already! Good thing I asked. Lumenos 20:42, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

How to gather evidence of RationalWikian corruption[edit]

I must be blunt; you're words are merely hearsay. What I am most interested in are the juiciest of the most injust diffs that you can muster. Only they could possibly alter any diff on their website and therefore these can only be useful for damning them. We already have them removing the comments I had not yet consented to; if they even try removing them, now that I have, this will be further ground for our Declaration of Independence from TOW! Lumenos 20:42, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

I am perfectly useless with wiki code and am an all round techni-phobe. I do not want, and will not, engage in wiki lawyering. I am a wiki-orator, not a wiki-clerk. MarcusCicero 22:45, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
That makes two of us. You know what I mean by diff? This is the diff of your last edit. If you are unwilling to produce such evidence of RationalWiggies' immoralities, the only consequence is that I might find that topic less interesting. Orations on my own perceptions would be most appreciated. But do as thou will. Nothing's permanent here AFAIK. Lumenos 00:48, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Have you considered, Sir, that perhaps they don't deserve you? Why not contribute to a more eeeam... deserving wiki? Lumenos 18:37, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

You do know that Lumeniki is a far more important wiki than TOW? You are free now. Tell us how it all started and why you never gave up on them/us/them. Lumenos 19:02, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Evaluating "MarcusCicero's" visible behaviour[edit]

Hmmm. Been looking over the edits of MarcusCicero from EmphaticlWiki. If this is you, you should be right at home here. I had the impression ey were a wandal, but ey don't seem to do that from what I can see. So long as I am in charge here, editors are responsible for thickening their own skin. Don't get me wrong, less "lumenotable" information gets a lower priority on the page, and if articles reach a size that may be a problem for slow internet connections, PDA's, etc, "unsubstantiated" criticism may have to be deported somewhere like a talkpage or subpage. I haven't decided if we should make "archives" (meaning pages that no one is supposed to edit) but perhaps that will be necessary for creating permanent links to certain information. Lumenos 01:54, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Sexual harassment of males[edit]

Conservativepunk argues that Lumenos is not as bad as MC, for Lumenos has never asked him for blow job (only wiki powers).

Someone posted a picture of "emself" and MC asked em if they were homosexual. If you need the evidence, google it umkay. We don't subject our men to anything beyond what they can endure and having something like that on some talk page with no response could possibly cause some irrationally defamating rumors.

Possible disciplinary options[edit]

I am this close to allowing the community here to call MC "homo" whenever they want. This close. Just keep that in mind before you try blowing off your mouth in lumenati territory.


If others want to edit war with you, I may not be of much help unless you both can agree on an arbiter who may not be me (unless I find the issue interesting or I am inclined to take a side). Lumenos 01:52, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

MC et al, evaluate Lumenos, etc[edit]

You are a very strange man. What is the deal with this wiki? Just you, is it? MarcusCicero 11:48, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

He is indeed a very strange little man, valiantly sinking his time into a useless goal. Lumenos, on the other hand, is fairly tolerable. Phantom Hoover 15:36, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
Imbecile. It is always the fashion of fascists and their acolytes to diminish the grand causes of others. Well my cause is the most grand of them all - Resistance to tyranny. MarcusCicero 17:32, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
Aw, Marcus. Using long words while trolling doesn't hide the fact that you spend an inordinate amount of time doing so for no apparent personal gain. Phantom Hoover 16:16, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
It is private property. Is this not always a mini-tyranny? How many need to be informed that it is a (tiny) "tyranny"? But it is no monopoly so long as we have somewhere better to go. Perhaps it is the most worthy of the tyrannies? Lumenos 20:14, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
Wow! You've got Hoovy nearly complimenting me after I produced this most damning piece of literature on eir blatant treasonings! What this place needs is more MarcusCicero! Lumenos 20:23, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
[I moved my comments from here to the talk page. ~ Lumenos 22:11, June 28, 2010 (UTC)]
You are a remarkable human being. 12:03, June 28, 2010 (UTC)